Dataset Identification:
Resource Abstract:
- Use and interpretation of statistics in wildlife journals are reviewed, and suggestions for improvement are offered. Populations
from which inferences are to be drawn should be clearly defined, and conclusions should be limited to the range of the data
analyzed. Authors should be careful to avoid improper methods of plotting data and should clearly define the use of estimates
of variance, standard deviation, standard error, or confidence intervals. Biological and statistical significant are often
confused by authors and readers. Statistical hypothesis testing is a tool, and not every question should be answered by hypothesis
testing. Meeting assumptions of hypothesis tests is the responsibility of authors, and assumptions should be reviewed before
a test is employed. The use of statistical tools should be considered carefully both before and after gathering data.
Citation
- Title Use and interpretation of statistics in wildlife journals
-
- Publication Date Date
1982
Topic Category:
geoscientificInformation
Resource language:
eng
Back to top:
Metadata data stamp:
2014-08-31T09:09:59Z
Metadata Constraints
-
- Constraints
-
- Use limitation statement:
- none
Metadata contact
-
author
- organisation Name
Tacha, Thomas C.
-
- Contact information
-
Metadata contact
-
author
- organisation Name
Warde, William D.
-
- Contact information
-
Metadata contact
-
author
- organisation Name
Burnham, Kenneth P.
-
- Contact information
-
Metadata contact
-
publisher
- organisation Name
Wildlife Society
-
- Contact information
-
Metadata scope code
dataset
Metadata language
eng USA
Metadata character set encoding:
utf8
Metadata standard for this record:
ISO19115
standard version:
1.0
Metadata record identifier:
53edcd56e4b0f61b386d24b9
URI for dataset described:
> https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/53edcd56e4b0f61b386d24b9
Metadata record format is ISO19139-2 XML (MI_Metadata)