Dataset Identification:
Resource Abstract:
- description: The National Water Quality Network (NWQN) for Rivers and Streams includes 113 surface-water river and stream
sites monitored by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Quality Program (NWQP). The NWQN represents the consolidation
of four historical national networks: the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Project, the USGS National Stream
Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN), the National Monitoring Network (NMN), and the Hydrologic Benchmark Network (HBN). The
NWQN includes 22 large river coastal sites, 41 large river inland sites, 30 wadeable stream reference sites, 10 wadeable stream
urban sites, and 10 wadeable stream agricultural sites. In addition to the 113 NWQN sites, 3 large inland river monitoring
sites from the USGS Cooperative Matching Funds program are also included in the NWQN to be consistent with previous USGS studies
of nutrient transport in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin. This data release provides estimated agricultural pesticide
use for 83 NWQN watersheds for 116 pesticide compounds from 1992-2014. Pesticide use was not estimated for the 30 wadeable
stream reference sites, or for 3 large river coastal sites (07381590, "Wax Lake Outlet at Calumet, LA3"; 07381600,
"Lower Atchafalaya River at Morgan City, LA2"; or 15565477, "Yukon River at Pilot Station, AK"). Use was
not estimated for reference sites because pesticides are not monitored at reference water-quality sampling sites. Pesticide
use data are not available for Alaska and thus no data is available for the Yukon River site. The other two coastal sites
(07381590 and 07381600) where use was not estimated are outflow distributaries into the Gulf of Mexico. This data release
provides use estimates for the same pesticide parent compounds sampled in water and analyzed by USGS, National Water Quality
Laboratory (NWQL), Schedule 2437: http://wwwnwql.cr.usgs.gov/USGS/catalog/index.cfm. Pesticide use data are not available
for degradate compounds or for compounds not used in agricultural applications. County-level pesticide use estimates and methods
for making the estimates are available on the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project (PNSP) page: https://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/usage/maps/,
https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7NP22KM. County-level estimates are based on farm surveys of pesticide use. Two estimates,
EPEST_LOW_KG and EPEST_HIGH_KG, provide a range of values of pesticide use and differ in how they treated situations where
surveys were done but pesticide use was not reported for a particular pesticide-by-crop combination. The HIGH method tends
to spread estimated use over a larger geographic area. EPEST_LOW_KG annual-use totals can be greater than EPEST_HIGH_KG totals
when the LOW method of estimation concentrates the use to a particular area while the HIGH method spreads the use over a larger
area. Details on the difference between the two estimates are explained on the PNSP page. There is uncertainty in both the
HIGH and LOW estimates that is difficult to quantify. A user should become familiar with the two methods to decide which estimate
is best for a specific application. To obtain estimates for NWQN watersheds county-level estimates were proportionally allocated
to agricultural land within each NWQN watershed. Zero values indicate that pesticide use was estimated for that watershed
but that the total use for the watershed was less than 0.1 kg. Null values indicate that use was not estimated because there
was not enough farm survey data available to make an estimate for that particular compound in that watershed. Place holder
rows were kept for all compounds and years regardless of whether an estimate was made so that users know which compounds were
included in the estimation process. Version 2 of this data release includes pesticide use estimates for glyphosate and glufosinate.
These compounds were sampled in water along with Schedule 2437 compounds but were analyzed by USGS, Organic Geochemistry Research
Laboratory (OGRL), Glyphosate, AMPA, and Glufosinate Method (LCGY): https://ks.water.usgs.gov/lcgy. In addition, duplicate
pesticide use values, inadvertently included in the previous version, for site 07144100 "Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick,
KS" were deleted. Two compound names, "cis-Permethrin" and "Paraoxon-ethyl", which were labelled
incorrectly in the previous version, were changed to "Permethrin" and "Parathion" respectively in Version
2. The total count of pesticide compounds, including glyphosate and glufosinate, for which use is estimated is 116. In the
previous version the number of compounds for which use was estimated was listed incorrectly as 110. Data from this release
are presented at the USGS Tracking Water Quality page: http://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/home (Deacon and others, 2015).
Use estimates provided here are for the corresponding watersheds and general time period provided in the data release by Deacon
and others (2016). Deacon, J.R., Lee, C.J., Norman, J.E., and Reutter, D.C., 2016, Nutrient and pesticide data collected from
the USGS National Water Quality Network and previous networks, 1980-2015, U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7BK19GZ
Deacon, J.R., Lee, C.J., Toccalino, P.L., Warren, M.P., Baker, N.T., Crawford, C.G., Gilliom, R.G., and Woodside, M.D., 2015,
Tracking water-quality of the Nations rivers and streams, U.S. Geological Survey Web page: http://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers,
https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F70G3H51.; abstract: The National Water Quality Network (NWQN) for Rivers and Streams includes
113 surface-water river and stream sites monitored by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Quality Program (NWQP).
The NWQN represents the consolidation of four historical national networks: the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA)
Project, the USGS National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN), the National Monitoring Network (NMN), and the Hydrologic
Benchmark Network (HBN). The NWQN includes 22 large river coastal sites, 41 large river inland sites, 30 wadeable stream reference
sites, 10 wadeable stream urban sites, and 10 wadeable stream agricultural sites. In addition to the 113 NWQN sites, 3 large
inland river monitoring sites from the USGS Cooperative Matching Funds program are also included in the NWQN to be consistent
with previous USGS studies of nutrient transport in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin. This data release provides estimated
agricultural pesticide use for 83 NWQN watersheds for 116 pesticide compounds from 1992-2014. Pesticide use was not estimated
for the 30 wadeable stream reference sites, or for 3 large river coastal sites (07381590, "Wax Lake Outlet at Calumet,
LA3"; 07381600, "Lower Atchafalaya River at Morgan City, LA2"; or 15565477, "Yukon River at Pilot Station,
AK"). Use was not estimated for reference sites because pesticides are not monitored at reference water-quality sampling
sites. Pesticide use data are not available for Alaska and thus no data is available for the Yukon River site. The other two
coastal sites (07381590 and 07381600) where use was not estimated are outflow distributaries into the Gulf of Mexico. This
data release provides use estimates for the same pesticide parent compounds sampled in water and analyzed by USGS, National
Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL), Schedule 2437: http://wwwnwql.cr.usgs.gov/USGS/catalog/index.cfm. Pesticide use data are
not available for degradate compounds or for compounds not used in agricultural applications. County-level pesticide use estimates
and methods for making the estimates are available on the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project (PNSP) page: https://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/usage/maps/,
https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7NP22KM. County-level estimates are based on farm surveys of pesticide use. Two estimates,
EPEST_LOW_KG and EPEST_HIGH_KG, provide a range of values of pesticide use and differ in how they treated situations where
surveys were done but pesticide use was not reported for a particular pesticide-by-crop combination. The HIGH method tends
to spread estimated use over a larger geographic area. EPEST_LOW_KG annual-use totals can be greater than EPEST_HIGH_KG totals
when the LOW method of estimation concentrates the use to a particular area while the HIGH method spreads the use over a larger
area. Details on the difference between the two estimates are explained on the PNSP page. There is uncertainty in both the
HIGH and LOW estimates that is difficult to quantify. A user should become familiar with the two methods to decide which estimate
is best for a specific application. To obtain estimates for NWQN watersheds county-level estimates were proportionally allocated
to agricultural land within each NWQN watershed. Zero values indicate that pesticide use was estimated for that watershed
but that the total use for the watershed was less than 0.1 kg. Null values indicate that use was not estimated because there
was not enough farm survey data available to make an estimate for that particular compound in that watershed. Place holder
rows were kept for all compounds and years regardless of whether an estimate was made so that users know which compounds were
included in the estimation process. Version 2 of this data release includes pesticide use estimates for glyphosate and glufosinate.
These compounds were sampled in water along with Schedule 2437 compounds but were analyzed by USGS, Organic Geochemistry Research
Laboratory (OGRL), Glyphosate, AMPA, and Glufosinate Method (LCGY): https://ks.water.usgs.gov/lcgy. In addition, duplicate
pesticide use values, inadvertently included in the previous version, for site 07144100 "Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick,
KS" were deleted. Two compound names, "cis-Permethrin" and "Paraoxon-ethyl", which were labelled
incorrectly in the previous version, were changed to "Permethrin" and "Parathion" respectively in Version
2. The total count of pesticide compounds, including glyphosate and glufosinate, for which use is estimated is 116. In the
previous version the number of compounds for which use was estimated was listed incorrectly as 110. Data from this release
are presented at the USGS Tracking Water Quality page: http://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers/home (Deacon and others, 2015).
Use estimates provided here are for the corresponding watersheds and general time period provided in the data release by Deacon
and others (2016). Deacon, J.R., Lee, C.J., Norman, J.E., and Reutter, D.C., 2016, Nutrient and pesticide data collected from
the USGS National Water Quality Network and previous networks, 1980-2015, U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7BK19GZ
Deacon, J.R., Lee, C.J., Toccalino, P.L., Warren, M.P., Baker, N.T., Crawford, C.G., Gilliom, R.G., and Woodside, M.D., 2015,
Tracking water-quality of the Nations rivers and streams, U.S. Geological Survey Web page: http://cida.usgs.gov/quality/rivers,
https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F70G3H51.
Citation
- Title Agricultural Pesticide Use Estimates for the USGS National Water Quality Network, 1992-2014: Version 2.
-
- creation Date
2018-05-20T01:28:37.383430
Resource language:
Processing environment:
Back to top:
Digital Transfer Options
-
- Linkage for online resource
-
- name Dublin Core references URL
- URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F72N50GZ
- protocol WWW:LINK-1.0-http--link
- link function information
- Description URL provided in Dublin Core references element.
Metadata data stamp:
2018-08-06T21:02:32Z
Resource Maintenance Information
- maintenance or update frequency:
- notes: This metadata record was generated by an xslt transformation from a dc metadata record; Transform by Stephen M. Richard, based
on a transform by Damian Ulbricht. Run on 2018-08-06T21:02:32Z
Metadata contact
-
pointOfContact
- organisation Name
CINERGI Metadata catalog
-
- Contact information
-
-
- Address
-
- electronic Mail Address cinergi@sdsc.edu
Metadata language
eng
Metadata character set encoding:
utf8
Metadata standard for this record:
ISO 19139 Geographic Information - Metadata - Implementation Specification
standard version:
2007
Metadata record identifier:
urn:dciso:metadataabout:48db4c15-0cde-4bf5-aeed-3291930072e2
Metadata record format is ISO19139 XML (MD_Metadata)