Shapefile for Coastal Zone Management Program counties of the United States and its territories, 2009 (CZMP_counties_2009.shp)
Dataset Identification:
Resource Abstract:
Shapefile for 492 Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP) counties and county equivalents, 2009, extracted from the U.S. Census
Bureau's MAF/TIGER database of U.S. counties and cross-referenced to a list of CZMP counties published by the NOAA/NOS Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM). Data extent to the nearest quarter degree is 141.00 E to 64.50 W longitude
and 14.75 S to 71.50 N latitude. TL2009 in this document refers to metadata content inherited from the original U.S. Census
Bureau (2009) TIGER/Line shapefile. TL2009: The TIGER/Line Shapefiles are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic
information from the Census MAF/TIGER database. The Census MAF/TIGER database represents a seamless national file with no
overlaps or gaps between parts. However, each TIGER/Line Shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent dataset or
the shapefiles can be combined to cover the whole nation.
Citation
Title Shapefile for Coastal Zone Management Program counties of the United States and its territories, 2009 (CZMP_counties_2009.shp)
Title INCITS.38-200x (R2004), INCITS.31-200x (R2007), INCITS.454-200x, INCITS 455-200x, INCITS 446-2008
purpose:
These polygons are provided as criteria for selecting georeferenced data from other databases. The precision of geographic
searches in any system that employs these polygons will depend on the nature of the search algorithm. This information is
not intended for navigational purposes. These data are intended for science researchers, students, policymakers, and the general
public. The data can be used with geographic information systems (GIS) software to display geologic and oceanographic information.
TL2009: In order for others to use the information in the Census MAF/TIGER database in a geographic information system (GIS)
or for other geographic applications, the Census Bureau releases to the public extracts of the database in the form of TIGER/Line
Shapefiles.
Browse image (thumbnail):
thumbnail file name:
file type: GIF
thumbnail file description:
browse graphic of CZMP counties shapefile
Resource language:
eng; USA
Resource progress code:
completed
Resource Maintenance Information
maintenance or update frequency:
asNeeded
Constraints on resource usage:
Constraints
Use limitation statement:
TL2009: No warranty, expressed or implied is made with regard to the accuracy of these data, and no liability is assumed by
the U.S. Government in general or the U.S. Census Bureau in specific as to the spatial or attribute accuracy of the data.
The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty and no responsibility is assumed by the U.S. government in
the use of these files. The boundary information in the TIGER/Line Shapefiles is for statistical data collection and tabulation
purposes only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes do not constitute a determination of jurisdictional
authority or rights of ownership or entitlement and they are not legal land descriptions.USGS:This dataset has been approved
for release and publication by the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although this dataset has been subjected
to rigorous review and is substantially complete, the USGS reserves the right to revise the data pursuant to further analysis
and review. Furthermore, it is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the United States Government may be held liable
for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process,
or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation,
or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Constraints on resource usage:
Legal Constraints
use constraint:
otherRestrictions
Other constraints
Use Constraints: This product provides polygons for coastal counties (and equivalent entities) as an aid in discovering online
information about coastal and nearshore regions. This product is not an authoritative description of the counties currently
included in the Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP), although a 2009 list of CZMP counties was used to select the counties
that are included. The current list of CZMP counties should be obtained directly from the NOAA/NOS Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management (OCRM). This information is not intended for navigational purposes.
Constraints on resource usage:
Legal Constraints
Access Constraints
otherRestrictions
Other constraints
Access Constraints: None
Spatial representation type code:
vector
Resource extent
Geographic Extent
Geographic Bounding Box
westBoundLongitude
-179.231086
eastBoundLongitude
179.859681
northBoundLatitude
71.441059
southBoundLatitude
-14.601813
Temporal Extent
2009-01-01
Additional information on resource:
The U.S. Census Bureau publishes density, land-use, and socio-economic information at various geographic scales (national,
state, territory). Information on coastal zone counties is increasingly important as human growth, development, and reliance
increases on coastal resources. The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) provides important information on the preservation,
protection, and management of the nation's coastal resources (<http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/czm/czm_act.html>). Implemented
through the NOAA/NOS Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), the Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP) includes
"those counties that are wholly or partially within the boundaries of a state's approved coastal management program" (<http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/success/media/contextualindicatormanual.pdf>).
The attributes for the USGS product are adapted from the attributes for the Census Bureau product. U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) Spatial Extents for Marine Gazetteers project. Project leaders: Frances L. Lightsom, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Coastal and Marine Geology Program (CMGP), Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center (flightsom@usgs.gov) Alan O. Allwardt,
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program (CMGP), Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center (aallwardt@usgs.gov)
Project background: Gazetteers of terrestrial and marine regions, including the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS),
GEOnet Names Server (GNS), GEBCO Gazetteer of Undersea Feature Names, and VLIZ Marine Gazetteer (VLIMAR), generally provide
single-point locations or rectangular bounding boxes for named features, because the primary function of these gazetteers
is to standardize geographic name usage. Many geospatial information services, however, would be improved if the authoritative
place names from these gazetteers were associated with polygons representing the actual spatial extents of the features in
question. The USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Program (CMGP) has created and compiled shapefiles to facilitate the retrieval
of georeferenced information resources related to named oceans and seas, undersea features, coastal features and waterways,
and relevant administrative areas including the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP)
counties. Geospatial information systems with the capability for searching user-defined, polygonal geographic areas will be
able to utilize these shapefiles or secondary products derived from them, such as well-known text (WKT) representations of
the individual polygons within the shapefiles. CMGP and its collaborators would benefit from improvements in the gazetteers
for these existing and planned geospatial information services: 1. The CMGP Knowledge Management Project provides online geospatial
search services for research data and scientific information (for example, CMG InfoBank and CMGDS). These geospatial search
services currently employ simple map interfaces and/or gazetteers with rectangular bounding boxes for spatial extents. 2.
The internal USGS Geospatial Management Information System (GMIS) has a gazetteer with polygons for locating field studies
on land, but it offers little aid for offshore searches, where many CMGP investigations are conducted. 3. Information services
for two interagency initiatives, marine planning (<http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oceans/cmsp>) and the Ocean
and Coastal Mapping (OCM) Inventory (<http://iocm.noaa.gov/iwg/>), are under development and could incorporate spatially enhanced
coastal and marine gazetteers. In this context, the primary purpose of including spatial extents for the place names in a
gazetteer is to assist information retrieval, rather than to establish precise boundaries. Planned project products, compiled
for incorporation into gazetteers: 1. Major ocean and sea boundaries (as defined by IHO and VLIMAR), incorporated into USGS
gazetteers. 2. Defined spatial extents for high-priority undersea features, incorporated into the GEBCO Gazetteer (in collaboration
with Lisa A. Taylor and John C. Cartwright, NOAA/NGDC/MGGD). 3. Spatial extents of named high-priority U.S. coastal features
and waterways, incorporated into an authoritative gazetteer. 4. Spatial extents of relevant U.S. administrative areas, including
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), National Marine Sanctuaries, and Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP) counties. Project
results: The project will improve communication about coastal and marine activities, and enhance usability and interoperability
of geospatial data services. The project will lay a foundation for future improvements by demonstrating formats and systems
that can be used for incorporating additional spatial extents into marine gazetteers. Project outcome: People will be more
successful in using familiar place names when they are looking for USGS projects and information, and other Federally funded
geospatial information, about coastal and offshore features. Project objective: To generate a set of databases, in a standard
format, that use polygons to define the spatial extents of named oceans and seas, undersea features, coastal features and
waterways, and relevant administrative areas. Glossary of terms, acronyms, and abbreviations: >ACUF - U.S. BGN Advisory Committee
on Undersea Features > <http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/acuf.html> >BGN - U.S. Board on Geographic Names > <http://geonames.usgs.gov/>
>BODC - British Oceanographic Data Centre > <http://www.bodc.ac.uk/> >CMG InfoBank - USGS CMGP field activity and data catalog
> <http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/infobank/> >CMGDS - USGS Coastal and Marine Geoscience Data System > <http://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/>
>CMGP - USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Program > <http://marine.usgs.gov/> >GAZ - gazetteer >GEBCO - General Bathymetric
Chart of the Oceans > <http://www.gebco.net/> >GMIS - USGS Geospatial Management Information System (USGS Intranet) >GNIS
- Geographic Names Information System > <http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/> >GNS - GEOnet Names Server > <http://earth-info.nga.mil/gns/html/>
>IHO - International Hydrographic Organization > <http://www.iho.int/> >Linestring - (aka polyline) an open graphic element
composed of straight-line segments connected at the vertices. >MAF/TIGER - Master Address File/Topologically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing (U.S. Census Bureau database) >NGA - National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency > <http://www.nga.mil/>
>NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration > <http://www.noaa.gov/> >NOAA/NGDC - NOAA National Geophysical Data
Center > <http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/ngdc.html> >NOAA/NGDC/MGGD - NOAA/NGDC Marine Geology and Geophysics Division > <http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mggd.html>
>NOAA/NOS - NOAA National Ocean Service > <http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/> >NOAA/NOS/OCRM - NOAA/NOS Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management > <http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/programs/ocrm/> >Polygon - a closed graphic element composed of straight-line
segments connected at the vertices. >OCM Inventory - Ocean and Coastal Mapping Inventory (of the Interagency Working Group
on Ocean and Coastal Mapping) > <http://iocm.noaa.gov/iwg/> >SCUFN - GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names > <http://www.gebco.net/data_and_products/undersea_feature_names/>
>Shapefile - geospatial vector data format that describes geometries as points, linestrings, and polygons (see above). A single
shapefile may contain multiple features of the same geometry (several individual polygons, for instance). >UF - undersea feature
>USGS - U.S. Geological Survey > <http://www.usgs.gov/> >VLIMAR - VLIZ Marine Gazetteer (now incorporated into Marine Regions
website) > <http://www.marineregions.org/> >VLIZ - Flanders Marine Institute > <http://www.vliz.be/en/intro> >WKT - well-known
text, a markup language for vector geometry objects > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_text>
point of contact
-
pointOfContact
individual Name Frances L. Lightsom
organisation Name
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program (CMGP)
position Name Supervisory Oceanographer
Contact information
Telephone
Voice (508) 457-2242
Fax (508) 457-2310
Address
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543
Country USA
evaluation Method Description
This dataset encompasses all of the Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP) counties as defined in 2009, including the data
for Alaska, which later withdrew from the CZMP. Retention of the Alaska data enhances the search capability that is the primary
focus of this compilation. Data completeness of the TIGER/Line Shapefiles reflects the contents of the Census MAF/TIGER database
at the time the TIGER/Line Shapefiles were created.
Completeness Omission
evaluation Method Description
This dataset encompasses all of the Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP) counties as defined in 2009, including the data
for Alaska, which later withdrew from the CZMP. Retention of the Alaska data enhances the search capability that is the primary
focus of this compilation. Data completeness of the TIGER/Line Shapefiles reflects the contents of the Census MAF/TIGER database
at the time the TIGER/Line Shapefiles were created.
ConceptualConsistency
measure Description
Polygon topology present. TL2009: The Census Bureau performed automated tests to ensure logical consistency and limits of
shapefiles. Segments making up the outer and inner boundaries of a polygon tie end-to-end to completely enclose the area.
All polygons are tested for closure. The Census Bureau uses its internally developed geographic update system to enhance and
modify spatial and attribute data in the Census MAF/TIGER database. Standard geographic codes, such as FIPS codes for states,
counties, municipalities, county subdivisions, places, American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian areas, and congressional
districts are used when encoding spatial entities. The Census Bureau performed spatial data tests for logical consistency
of the codes during the compilation of the original Census MAF/TIGER database files. Most of the codes for geographic entities
except states, counties, urban areas, Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs), American Indian Areas (AIAs), and congressional
districts were provided to the Census Bureau by the USGS, the agency responsible for maintaining FIPS 55. Feature attribute
information has been examined but has not been fully tested for consistency. For the TIGER/Line Shapefiles, the Point and
Vector Object Count for the G-polygon SDTS Point and Vector Object Type reflects the number of records in the shapefile attribute
table. For multi-polygon features, only one attribute record exists for each multi-polygon rather than one attribute record
per individual G-polygon component of the multi-polygon feature. TIGER/Line Shapefile multi-polygons are an exception to the
G-polygon object type classification. Therefore, when multi-polygons exist in a shapefile, the object count will be less than
the actual number of G-polygons. The TIGER/Line Shapefile products are not copyrighted, however TIGER/Line and Census TIGER
are registered trademarks of the U.S. Census Bureau. These products are free to use in a product or publication, however acknowledgement
must be given to the U.S. Census Bureau as the source. The boundary information in the TIGER/Line Shapefiles are for statistical
data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute
a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement and they are not legal land descriptions.
Coordinates in the TIGER/Line shapefiles have six implied decimal places, but the positional accuracy of these coordinates
is not as great as the six decimal places suggest. Additional aspects of the TIGER/Line shapefiles were clarified in a written
communication from the U.S. Census Bureau to the USGS project leaders: "We refer to the seaward limit of water in the TIGER/Line
shapefiles as the 3-mile limit. This 3-mile limit serves to define the outer limit of coverage by the MAF/TIGER database.
Our 3-mile limit does not represent any sort of formal legal or administrative boundary and is not intended to define official
limits for Federal programs or legal disputes even though it is often very similar to the Submerged Lands Act boundary. In
most areas, our 3-mile limit is approximately 3 nautical miles out to sea (or ocean), and is similar (but not identical) to
the old limit of the United States' territorial waters (before the limit of territorial waters changed from 3 to 12 nautical
miles in 1988). While our 3-mile limit has not been substantially modified since the creation of our TIGER Database, we are
currently looking into possible modifications/improvements for the future to make it more consistent with other Federal limits"
(Geographic Products Branch, Geography Division, U.S. Census Bureau, written communication to Alan O. Allwardt dated 13 June
2011). USGS: This product provides polygons for coastal counties (and equivalent entities) as an aid in discovering online
information about coastal and nearshore regions. This product is not an authoritative description of the counties currently
included in the Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP), although a 2009 list of CZMP counties was used to select the counties
that are included. The current list of CZMP counties should be obtained directly from the NOAA/NOS Office of Ocean and Coastal
Resource Management (OCRM). This information is not intended for navigational purposes. Read and fully comprehend the metadata
prior to data use. Uses of these data should not violate the spatial resolution of the data. Where these data are used in
combination with other data of different resolution, the resolution of the combined output will be limited by the lowest resolution
of all the data. Acknowledge the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in products derived from these data. Share data products developed
using these data with the U.S. Geological Survey. This dataset has been approved for release and publication by the Director
of the USGS. Although this dataset has been subjected to rigorous review and is substantially complete, the USGS reserves
the right to revise the data pursuant to further analysis and review. Furthermore, it is released on condition that neither
the USGS nor the United States Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized
use. Although this Federal Geographic Data Committee-compliant metadata file is intended to document these data in nonproprietary
form, as well as in ArcInfo format, this metadata file may include some ArcInfo-specific terminology.
notes: This metadata was automatically generated from the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata standard (version FGDC-STD-001-1998)
using the 2012-06-20T17:21:00 version of the FGDC RSE to ISO 19115-2 transform.
Metadata contact
-
pointOfContact
individual Name Frances L. Lightsom
organisation Name
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Coastal and Marine Geology Program (CMGP)
Contact information
Telephone
Voice (508) 457-2242
Fax (508) 457-2310
Address
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543
Country USA