Dataset Identification:
Resource Abstract:
- description: The National Wildlife Refuge System s 150 million acres in over 500 refuges representdiverse landscapes with
different capacities to provide ecosystem goods and services to society.Natural processes associated with management of national
wildlife refuges provide benefits tolocal communities by sustaining production of specific goods and services that are useful
topeople. Estimated economic values of these services, such as those presented in this report, can be used to compare refuges
in different locations and under different management, climatic, or socio economic conditions. Our estimates of economic benefits
from natural ecosystems serve as complements to economic impact analyses, such as the FWS s Banking on Nature studies (Carver
and Caudill 2007). This report presents the methods and results from Phase I of our research project. In this report we compare
wetlands on four national wildlife refuges to illustrate how existing data can be used to estimate the average annual economic
benefits of specific ecosystem services from different types of wetlands. The four sites are Arrowwood National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR), North Dakota; Blackwater NWR, Maryland; Okefenokee NWR, Georgia; and Sevilleta and Bosque del Apache NWRs, New Mexico.
These four sites were selected to contrast major types of wetlands in terms of physical and social parameters that influence
the values of different ecosystem goods and services. We present multiple approaches to assessing ecosystem services benefits.
For each of the four refuges, we first consider a purely qualitative assessment of the relative magnitudes of different ecosystem
service benefits provided by each refuge. This approach proves to be the most inclusive in terms of our ability to consider
ecological data specific to the refuge, and provides a useful tool for broad assessments and comparisons across refuges. However,
it does not lead to quantitative estimates of ecosystem service benefits. For these estimates, we use two different benefit
transfer techniques: (1) a meta analysis benefit transfer to estimate the economic values of storm protection, water quality
provisioning, and support for nursery and habitat for commercial fishing species; and (2) a point transfer approach to estimate
the value of stored carbon. Our results suggest that refuge size and the socio demographic characteristics of the surrounding
region are important determinates of the estimated per acre value of wetlands in providing ecosystem services. Consistent
with economic theory, larger refuges in areas with lower population density tend to have lower per acre values. However, these
interaction effects between wetland size, population size and preferences, and ecosystem service values need to be further
studied. Our results are an approximation of consumers aggregate willingness to pay to obtain the service provided by the
wetlands of a particular NWR. Decision makers can use these numbers to understand how a population might be impacted by a
change in distribution of wetlands across a landscape. The most straightforward application of the method we follow concerns
estimating the net economic value of a change in an ecosystem service due to a management action which changes a wetland from
one type to another. This report represents Phase I of our efforts to estimate the ecosystem service benefits of the National
Wildlife Refuge System. The primary focus of the second phase will be the development of a meta analysis benefit transfer
model specifically tailored toward wetlands in National Wildlife Refuges.; abstract: The National Wildlife Refuge System s
150 million acres in over 500 refuges representdiverse landscapes with different capacities to provide ecosystem goods and
services to society.Natural processes associated with management of national wildlife refuges provide benefits tolocal communities
by sustaining production of specific goods and services that are useful topeople. Estimated economic values of these services,
such as those presented in this report, can be used to compare refuges in different locations and under different management,
climatic, or socio economic conditions. Our estimates of economic benefits from natural ecosystems serve as complements to
economic impact analyses, such as the FWS s Banking on Nature studies (Carver and Caudill 2007). This report presents the
methods and results from Phase I of our research project. In this report we compare wetlands on four national wildlife refuges
to illustrate how existing data can be used to estimate the average annual economic benefits of specific ecosystem services
from different types of wetlands. The four sites are Arrowwood National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), North Dakota; Blackwater NWR,
Maryland; Okefenokee NWR, Georgia; and Sevilleta and Bosque del Apache NWRs, New Mexico. These four sites were selected to
contrast major types of wetlands in terms of physical and social parameters that influence the values of different ecosystem
goods and services. We present multiple approaches to assessing ecosystem services benefits. For each of the four refuges,
we first consider a purely qualitative assessment of the relative magnitudes of different ecosystem service benefits provided
by each refuge. This approach proves to be the most inclusive in terms of our ability to consider ecological data specific
to the refuge, and provides a useful tool for broad assessments and comparisons across refuges. However, it does not lead
to quantitative estimates of ecosystem service benefits. For these estimates, we use two different benefit transfer techniques:
(1) a meta analysis benefit transfer to estimate the economic values of storm protection, water quality provisioning, and
support for nursery and habitat for commercial fishing species; and (2) a point transfer approach to estimate the value of
stored carbon. Our results suggest that refuge size and the socio demographic characteristics of the surrounding region are
important determinates of the estimated per acre value of wetlands in providing ecosystem services. Consistent with economic
theory, larger refuges in areas with lower population density tend to have lower per acre values. However, these interaction
effects between wetland size, population size and preferences, and ecosystem service values need to be further studied. Our
results are an approximation of consumers aggregate willingness to pay to obtain the service provided by the wetlands of a
particular NWR. Decision makers can use these numbers to understand how a population might be impacted by a change in distribution
of wetlands across a landscape. The most straightforward application of the method we follow concerns estimating the net economic
value of a change in an ecosystem service due to a management action which changes a wetland from one type to another. This
report represents Phase I of our efforts to estimate the ecosystem service benefits of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
The primary focus of the second phase will be the development of a meta analysis benefit transfer model specifically tailored
toward wetlands in National Wildlife Refuges.
Citation
- Title National Wildlife Refuge Wetland Ecosystem Service Valuation Model, Phase 1 Report: An Assessment of Ecosytem Services Associated
with National Wildlife Refuges.
-
- creation Date
2018-05-10T07:50:38.240298
Resource language:
Processing environment:
Back to top:
Metadata data stamp:
2018-08-06T21:10:50Z
Resource Maintenance Information
- maintenance or update frequency:
- notes: This metadata record was generated by an xslt transformation from a dc metadata record; Transform by Stephen M. Richard, based
on a transform by Damian Ulbricht. Run on 2018-08-06T21:10:50Z
Metadata contact
-
pointOfContact
- organisation Name
CINERGI Metadata catalog
-
- Contact information
-
-
- Address
-
- electronic Mail Address cinergi@sdsc.edu
Metadata language
eng
Metadata character set encoding:
utf8
Metadata standard for this record:
ISO 19139 Geographic Information - Metadata - Implementation Specification
standard version:
2007
Metadata record identifier:
urn:dciso:metadataabout:1f1ff011-ea1f-4bac-9f50-5d577de29ac3
Metadata record format is ISO19139 XML (MD_Metadata)