Dataset Identification:

Resource Abstract:
Sage-Grouse habitat areas divided into proposed management categories within Nevada and California project study boundaries.HABITAT CATEGORY DETERMINATIONThe process for category determination was directed by the Nevada Sagebrush Ecosystem Technical team. Sage-grouse habitat was determined from a statewide resource selection function model and first categorized into 4 classes: high, moderate, low, and non-habitat. The standard deviations (SD) from a normal distribution of RSF values created from a set of validation points (10% of the entire telemetry dataset) were used to categorize habitat quality classes. 1) High quality habitat comprised pixels with RSF values < 0.5 SD.2) Moderate > 0.5 and < 1.0 SD. 3) Low < 1.0 . 4) Non-Habitat > 1.5 SD. Coates, P.S., Casazza, M.L., Brussee, B.E., Ricca, M.A., Gustafson, K.B., Overton, C.T., Sanchez-Chopitea, E., Kroger, T., Mauch, K., Niell, L., Howe, K., Gardner, S., Espinosa, S., and Delehanty, D.J. 2014, Spatially explicit modeling of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat in Nevada and northeastern California A decision-support tool for management: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1163, 83 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141163. ISSN 2331-1258 (online)REFERENCES Beyer HL. 2012. Geospatial Modelling Environment (Version 0.7.2.0). http://www.spatialecology.com/gmeCoates PS, Casazza ML, Blomberg EJ, Gardner SC, Espinosa SP, Yee JL, Wiechman L, Halstead BJ. 2013. Evaluating greater sage-grouse seasonal space use relative to leks: Implications for surface use designations in sagebrush ecosystems. The Journal of Wildlife Management 77: 1598-1609.Doherty KE, Tack JD, Evans JS, Naugle DE. 2010. Mapping breeding densities of greater sage-grouse: A tool for range-wide conservation planning. Bureau of Land Management. Report Number: L10PG00911. Accessed at: http://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationByGeography/NorthAmerica/Pages/sagegrouse.aspx# Duong T. 2012. ks: Kernel smoothing. R package version 1.8.10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ksHorne JS, Garton EO. 2006. Likelihood cross-validation versus least squares cross-validation for choosing the smoothing parameter in kernel home-range analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 641-648.Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.Vander Wal E, Rodgers AR. 2012. An individual-based quantitative approach for delineating core areas of animal space use. Ecological Modelling 224: 48-53.NOTE: This file does not include habitat areas for the Bi-State management area.
Citation
Title Habitat Categories for Greater Sage-grouse in Nevada and California (August 2014)
publication  Date   2014-02-26
presentationForm  VECTOR DIGITAL DATA SET (POLYGON)
cited responsible party - originator
organisation Name  U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station
cited responsible party -
organisation Name
Contact information
Linkage for online resource
URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F75D8PW8
Topic Category:  biota,boundaries,environment
Theme keywords (theme):
Biota, Boundaries, Environment
Greater sage-grouse
thesaurus name >
Title None
Location keywords:
USA, Great Basin, Nevada
thesaurus name >
Title None
Temporal keywords:
2014
thesaurus name >
Title None
purpose:
These data provide the Nevada Sagebrush Ecosystem Council, and other wildlife managers, with an additional resource to aid in planning and management of greater sage-grouse populations.
Resource language:  eng; USA
Resource progress code:  completed
Resource Maintenance Information
maintenance or update frequency:  notPlanned
Constraints on resource usage:
Constraints
Use limitation statement:
Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government
Constraints on resource usage:
Legal Constraints
use constraint:  otherRestrictions
Other constraints
Use Constraints: The authors of these data require that users direct any questions pertaining to appropriate use or assistance with understanding limitations and interpretation of the data to the individuals/organization listed in the Point of Contact section.
Constraints on resource usage:
Legal Constraints
Access Constraints  otherRestrictions
Other constraints
Access Constraints: None
Spatial representation type code:  vector
Processing environment:  Native Dataset Environment: Environment as of Metadata Creation: Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.2.2 (Build 3552) Service Pack N/A (Build N/A)
Resource extent
Geographic Extent
Geographic Bounding Box
westBoundLongitude  -121.549936143
eastBoundLongitude  -114.038120374
northBoundLatitude  41.997346396
southBoundLatitude  37.559186349
Temporal Extent
1999-05-22 2013-10-31
Additional information on resource:
Coates, P.S., Casazza, M.L., Brussee, B.E., Ricca, M.A., Gustafson, K.B., Overton, C.T., Sanchez-Chopitea, E., Kroger, T., Mauch, K., Niell, L., Howe, K., Gardner, S., Espinosa, S., and Delehanty, D.J. 2014, Spatially explicit modeling of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat in Nevada and northeastern California A decision-support tool for management: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1163, 83 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141163. ISSN 2331-1258 (online)
Credits:
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon. CA. Nevada Sagebrush Ecosystem Program, Carson City, NV.
point of contact - pointOfContact
individual Name Peter Coates
organisation Name  U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center
position Name Research Wildlife Biologist
Contact information
Telephone
Voice (530) 669-5073
Fax (707) 678-5039
Address
800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620 Country US
electronic Mail Addresspcoates@usgs.gov
Back to top:

Vector spatial representation information

Geometric Objects
geometric Object Type  complex
geometric Object Count  4
Back to top

Coverage description

Type of coverage content
Cell value attribute description:
Band
descriptor Unknown
sequence Identifier
name OBJECTID
Long Wavelength  4
Short Wavelength  1
units
Band
descriptor The process for category determination was directed by the Nevada Sagebrush Ecosystem Technical team. Sage-grouse habitat was determined from a statewide resource selection function model and first categorized into 4 classes: high, moderate, low, and non-habitat. The standard deviations (SD) from a normal distribution of RSF values created from a set of validation points (10% of the entire telemetry dataset) were used to categorize habitat quality classes.
sequence Identifier
name Habitat
Band
descriptor Polygon perimeter lengths in meters.
sequence Identifier
name Shape_Leng
Long Wavelength  66976969.3249
Short Wavelength  33638722.3813
units
Band
descriptor Area in Acres.
sequence Identifier
name Acres
Long Wavelength  24812649.9826
Short Wavelength  3979828.119
units
Band
descriptor Length of feature in internal units.
sequence Identifier
name Shape_Length
Long Wavelength  88027429.2437908
Short Wavelength  44003536.9633357
units
Band
descriptor Area of feature in internal units squared.
sequence Identifier
name Shape_Area
Long Wavelength  170228366551.392
Short Wavelength  27672121701.7741
units
Back to top

Content information: feature catalog description

Included With Dataset  true
Feature Types  
Back to top

Scope of quality information
scope level  dataset
Resource lineage description
AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy
name Of Measure Horizontal Positional Accuracy Report
evaluation Method Description  A formal accuracy assessment of the horizontal positional information in the data set has not been conducted.
AbsoluteExternalPositionalAccuracy
name Of Measure Vertical Positional Accuracy Report
evaluation Method Description  A formal accuracy assessment of the vertical positional information in the data set has either not been conducted, or is not applicable.
Completeness Commission
evaluation Method Description  Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.
Completeness Omission
evaluation Method Description  Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.
ConceptualConsistency
measure Description  No formal logical accuracy tests were conducted.

Resource distribution information

Distributor
distributor contact - distributor
organisation Name  U.S. Geological Survey - ScienceBase
Contact information
Telephone
Voice 1-888-275-8747
Address
Denver Federal BuildingBuilding 810Mail Stop 302, Denver, CO, 80225 Country US
electronic Mail Addresssciencebase@usgs.gov
Metadata data stamp:  2015-11-19
Resource Maintenance Information
maintenance or update frequency:  annually
notes: This metadata was automatically generated from the FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata standard (version FGDC-STD-001-1998) using the 2012-06-20T17:21:00 version of the FGDC RSE to ISO 19115-2 transform.
Metadata contact - pointOfContact
individual Name K. Benjamin Gustafson
organisation Name  U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station
position Name Geographer
Contact information
Telephone
Voice 530-669-5069
Fax 707-678-5039
Address
800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA, 95620 Country US
electronic Mail Addressbgustafson@usgs.gov
Metadata scope code  dataset
Metadata language  eng; USA
Metadata character set encoding:   utf8
Metadata standard for this record:  ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data
standard version:  ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
Metadata record identifier:  d2116a9f-ce11-4e96-9ddc-b22a20607e76

Metadata record format is ISO19139-2 XML (MI_Metadata)